Psychometric Testing - IS IT RELIABLE?

​






​​Psychometric tests are widely used in the recruitment process as a means of evaluating a candidate's abilities, skills, personality traits, and cognitive abilities. These tests are designed to provide objective data that can help employers make informed decisions about which candidates are the best fit for a particular role. However, the reliability of psychometric tests in a recruitment setting can vary depending on several factors.

One of the key factors that affect the reliability of psychometric tests is the quality of the test itself. Not all psychometric tests are created equal, and some tests are more reliable than others. Tests that have been thoroughly researched and validated are generally more reliable than those that have not undergone rigorous testing. Additionally, tests that are administered and scored consistently and accurately are also more reliable.

Another factor that can affect the reliability of psychometric tests in a recruitment setting is the characteristics of the candidate being tested. For example, if a candidate is experiencing a high level of stress or anxiety during the test, their performance may not accurately reflect their true abilities. Similarly, candidates who are not native speakers of the language in which the test is administered may have difficulty understanding the questions or responding accurately, which can affect the reliability of the results.

The administration and scoring procedures used can also have an impact on the reliability of psychometric tests. If the test is not administered or scored consistently across all candidates, this can lead to inconsistent results and reduce the overall reliability of the test. It is therefore important for recruiters to follow standardized procedures for administering and scoring tests to ensure that the results are as reliable as possible.

Despite these potential sources of variability, psychometric tests can be highly reliable when used appropriately. In fact, research has consistently shown that well-designed psychometric tests can be highly predictive of job performance, particularly for cognitive abilities and personality traits.

For example, one study found that cognitive ability tests also known as General Mental Ability (GMA) tests were the best predictor of job performance, with a correlation coefficient of 0.53. This means that the test results were highly correlated with job performance. In their seminal research on the subject  Schmidt and Hunter (1998) found that when the GMA test is combined with one other selection procedure,  such as an Integrity test or a structured interview, the correlation coefficient rose to .63

Personality tests can also be reliable predictors of job performance, although their reliability can vary depending on the specific traits being measured. Some traits, such as conscientiousness and emotional stability, have been found to be highly predictive of job performance, while other traits, such as extraversion, may be less reliable predictors.

In addition to their reliability, psychometric tests also offer several other benefits in a recruitment setting. For example, they can help reduce the risk of bias in the hiring process by providing objective data that can be used to make hiring decisions. They can also help identify candidates who may be a good fit for the company culture, which is an important consideration when making hiring decisions.

However, it is important to note that psychometric tests should not be used as the sole basis for hiring decisions. Other factors, such as a candidate's experience, education, and fit with the company culture, should also be considered.

It is also possible these days to find tests that assess competencies based on specific professions. For example Sales Candidate specific tests, seek to evaluate factors such as, interpersonal and negotiation skills,  analytical ability and numeracy skills.

In conclusion, psychometric tests can be highly reliable in a recruitment setting when used appropriately. The reliability of these tests can be affected by several factors, including the quality of the test itself, the characteristics of the candidate being tested, and the administration and scoring procedures used.

Despite these potential sources of variability, well-designed psychometric tests can be highly predictive of job performance and offer several benefits in the recruitment process. However, it is important to use these tests as part of a larger assessment strategy that takes into account a range of factors that are relevant to the job, the candidates skills and experience and the candidate's potential fit with the organisation.

 Fifth Executive is a boutique recruitment agency specialising in the recruitment of top sales talent.

---